Most industries tend to have their own special jargon that can be hard for anyone outside the business to initially understand and the wedding photography industry is no different! So, whilst every photographer is unique and may interpret these terms slightly differently, here we’ll do our best to break down and simplify some of the buzzwords and industry terms that you might hear in the search for someone to capture unposed, candid wedding photography and the differences that may or may not exist between some of the most common terms such as:
A GUIDE FOR COUPLES
DOCUMENTARY VS REPORTAGE VS PHOTOJOURNALIST WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHY
WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
Documentary Wedding Photographer, Wedding Photojournalist, Candid, Reportage, Street style, Docustreet – there are so many different terms used to refer to non-posed wedding photography and unstaged moments, but what do these terms really mean and is there any difference?

DOCUMENTARY / UNPOSED WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHY – A GLOSSARY OF TERMS
1. Documentary Wedding Photography
Documentary wedding photography is perhaps the most commonly used phrase when referring to wedding photographs that are taken directly in the moment without any form of posing. What can be quite confusing though is that there is actually a big difference between documentary wedding photography and a documentary wedding photographer.
Whilst there are many subtleties to the art form, documentary wedding photography in its most basic form simply refers to taking a completely unposed wedding photograph. What can be a little confusing though is that just about every wedding photographer will, for some portion of a wedding day, take unposed wedding photographs. For example your wedding photographer is generally naturally expected to capture key parts of a wedding day such as the ceremony itself and the speeches and first dance, but during these times the photographer is (in normal circumstances) unable to interrupt and direct a photograph. So virtually every wedding photographer does inevitably take some volume of documentary wedding photography.
The difference for a specialist documentary wedding photographer though is that they will not only be looking to take unposed imagery when there is no other choice but will actively be seeking to capture natural, non-staged images through every part of a wedding.
True documentary wedding photographers thrive on capturing real moments just the way they happened and are highly skilled at adapting to the situation around them to create interesting compositions and capture perfectly timed moments without directing the scene. The aim of the documentary wedding photographer is quite literally to document the day and, whilst some documentary photographers may still capture a limited number of posed portraits or group photographs at the couple’s request, posed photographs will never be made a prominent part of a true documentary wedding photographer’s portfolio.


2. Reportage Wedding Photography
In relation to wedding photography the terms reportage and documentary are often used interchangeably and generally hold the same meaning – a completely unstaged wedding photograph captured as it happened without direct interference from the photographer.
Historically the term reportage is perhaps more closely connected with the third term in this glossary – photojournalism. Where documentary photography has often been seen as perhaps more of a long term study and project on a particular subject where the photographs may be collected in a series and not be accompanied by any additional explanation, reportage has traditionally been concerned with directly reporting an individual news event. Consequently reportage photography has, in some ways, often been more of a literal representation of an event, designed to be accompanied and explained by a written text. So the overall style of photograph is generally similar or the same as documentary but the original purpose behind the image may have been quite different.
Often though, both reportage and documentary style photographers are actually referring to the same overall concept, especially in the wedding world where effectively both report on a single event, i.e. a wedding. It may be argued that a documentary photographer is actually using individual weddings to create a wider long term project (for example here at York Place Studios we capture individual weddings for our couples but also curate images into a wider study of people within a structured environment), however the terms have become so widely interchangeable that the same may equally now be true of someone who simply prefers the term r”eportage wedding photographer” to the term “documentarian”.





3. Wedding Photojournalist
The term ‘Wedding Photojournalist’ is generally used mostly as a way for documentary or reportage style wedding photographers to distinguish themselves from wedding photographers that are mostly focussed on posed imagery but inevitably take a limited amount of unposed documentary style images on a wedding day (see documentary wedding photography section for further details).
Photojournalists are of course traditionally simply journalists who use their camera rather than their keyboards to report the news. Photojournalism is about telling a story through photographs which ultimately, in wedding terms is the same goal as someone calling themselves a documentary or reportage photographer and once again ultimately these terms are, in the wedding world, in most cases likely to refer to the same overarching style of capturing a wedding without posing or moving the subject.
Common to all three terms/styles (documentary, photojournalism and reportage) is also an unspoken rule that the photographs should generally not be overly manipulated or photoshopped in post production. It might be argued however that a photographer calling themselves a wedding photojournalist should pay particular respect to this rule, as in traditional news photojournalism images should not be manipulated in any way whatsoever.


4. Street Style Wedding Photography / Street Documentary Wedding Photography
Whilst Documentary, Reportage and Photojournalistic wedding photography all refer predominantly to the same thing, street style or street documentary is a little different.
Street style wedding photography is a modern variation on the ideals of documentary wedding photography and, whilst still based on capturing real moments without posing, is based more on the art form of street photography than on traditional photojournalism.
Where documentary or reportage photography are often focussed quite literally on documenting an event exactly as it happened (originally for news publishing or historical reference), street photography is traditionally a purely artistic pursuit. Despite the name street photography does not have to happen in a street or urban environment (particularly in the case of street wedding photography!) and (whilst it is a very difficult genre to truly define) is, very broadly speaking about photographing people being themselves in a public situation or, perhaps more accurately, about revealing human qualities, sometimes even in the absence of any actual people within the frame of the photograph.
It could be argued that it is that focus on capturing human qualities that distinguishes street photography from pure documentary photography. Here the aim is not to document the event itself as such, but to try document the people at the event and reveal something about them, or even something about the photographer themself.
Back in the wedding world street style wedding photography differs from traditional documentary wedding photography in a very similar way. Whilst street documentary certainly still captures the key events of a wedding day, the street style wedding photographer is really more concerned with the people at the wedding than the event itself. Street style wedding photographers look to capture spontaneous moments in creative ways to tell an often less literal story than a traditional documentary photograph might look to portray. The street style wedding photographer is also more likely to try to inject their own personality into a photograph, often using composition and timing to create humour or to accent the relationships between people, whether that relationship is one of strangers or of close family.
Street style wedding photography (also sometimes referred to as “Docustreet”) is still very much an emerging genre and one that was pioneered in part by our own York Place Studios photographers Dominique and Liam Shaw. You can find further information about how Dominique and Liam came to bring these two separate art forms together to create a new genre of wedding photography here.



5. Candid Wedding Photography
Look up the word candid in the dictionary and you’ll see two possible meanings – one refers directly to “a candid” as a photograph “taken informally, especially without the subject’s knowledge” and the other refers to being truthful.
All of the wedding photography terms discussed above refer to the capturing of candid images – images that the subject in most cases is not especially aware of being taken (or at least is not being asked to pose or alter their behaviour in order for the photograph to be taken).
But all of these terms all refer to photographs that are, in some way, about truth. The difference between traditional wedding photography and all of the art forms we’ve outlined is that in the candid, documentary style there are no artificial constructs. The story may not always be absolutely literal and the photographer will often use their skill and creativity to heighten the reality or highlight certain aspects but fundamentally documentary, reportage, photojournalistic, street-style, all of these styles are based on capturing the real, spontaneous moments and interactions of a wedding day the way it really happened. Candid wedding photography or the acquisition of “candids” is consequently perhaps an accurate summary.
Related Articles



